[1]

Partner Context

Asset, endpoint and cybersecurity platforms that want to add vulnerability decision support without building a separate vulnerability-analysis capacity from scratch. 

[2]

Problem

Generic CVE matches and severity scores do not show which vulnerabilities actually matter in a customer’s environment. 

Effective prioritization of CVEs requires more context.

[IMAGE]
Illustrative view of partner-provided asset and software context linked to relevant CVEs.
[3]

Solution
Implementation

Partners provide software, version and publisher data; ThreatFinder returns decision support indicators that can be embedded into existing dashboards, product views and workflows.

[4]

Partner-ready Output

ThreatFinder’s input complements the client-owned risk decisions, including: 

  • Software and version-specific vulnerability matches 
  • Prioritization signals
  • Clearly marked findings requiring further review
  • Supporting vulnerability and threat intelligence
[5]

Action
& Outcome

Partners contribute vulnerability information while keeping customers inside the platforms and workflows they already use.

[6]

Partner
Outcomes

  • Embed vulnerability intelligence into existing products and workflows 
  • Use the data you already have across assets, software and configurations 
  • Support customer-owned risk decisions rather than replacing them

Provide vulnerability decision support.

Discuss OEM/API Integration

Why now?

Vulnerability context belongs inside the workflow.

[1]

Platform Expectations

Customers expect security intelligence inside the tools they already use. 

[2]

Prioritization Pressure

Growing vulnerability volumes make generic severity-based approaches less effective. 

[3]

Integration Readiness

Platforms with software data are well positioned to deliver vulnerability intelligence.